head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs stealth-browser-mcp

CloakBrowser has 32,721 GitHub stars, 2,721 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. stealth-browser-mcp has 3,333 stars, 410 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 882% (32,721 vs 3,333 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; stealth-browser-mcp is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, stealth-browser-mcp 12%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, cloudflare-bypass), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 33K stealth-browser-mcp ★ 3.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser stealth-browser-mcp
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 410
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick stealth-browser-mcp if

  • You want the stealth-browser-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and stealth-browser-mcp fits your workflow better

full stealth-browser-mcp profile →

About CloakBrowser

Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About stealth-browser-mcp

Stealth Browser MCP Stealth browser automation for MCP compatible AI agents. Navigate Cloudflare challenges, anti bot checks, and login walls with real Chrome family browser instances powered by nodriver, Chrome DevTools Protocol, and FastMCP. Sponsors NodeMaven — The most efficient proxy provider for Web Scraping and Automation with the Highest Quality IP on the market. Why NodeMaven? ZIP targeting 99.9% uptime IP filtering: all proxies have fraud score RapidProxy powers scraping and automation with 90M+ residential IPs across 200+ countries, supporting rotation, geo targeting, and high concurrency to improve…

read the full stealth-browser-mcp overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or stealth-browser-mcp more popular?

CloakBrowser has 32,721 GitHub stars and stealth-browser-mcp has 3,333. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and stealth-browser-mcp free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and stealth-browser-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and stealth-browser-mcp?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and stealth-browser-mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or stealth-browser-mcp?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,721 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose stealth-browser-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.