head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs dots

CloakBrowser has 31,829 GitHub stars, 2,646 forks, 237 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. dots has 1,942 stars, 320 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1,539% (31,829 vs 1,942 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; dots is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, dots 16%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 32K dots ★ 1.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser dots
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-09-29
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 320
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick dots if

  • You want the dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and dots fits your workflow better

full dots profile →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About dots

dots is an open source AI web agent that ships with its own anti detect Firefox browser, aimed at developers and automation engineers who need an agent to browse, log in and click through real websites without being blocked.

read the full dots overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 90K Scrapling ★ 85K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

CloakBrowser vs Browser Use CloakBrowser vs Scrapling CloakBrowser vs Crawl4AI CloakBrowser vs scrapy CloakBrowser vs EasySpider CloakBrowser vs Lightpanda CloakBrowser vs changedetection.io CloakBrowser vs lux CloakBrowser vs Scrapegraph-ai CloakBrowser vs page-agent CloakBrowser vs ArchiveBox CloakBrowser vs crawlee

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or dots more popular?

CloakBrowser has 31,829 GitHub stars and dots has 1,942. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and dots free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and dots under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and dots?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and dots in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or dots?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,829 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dots if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.