head to head · open source

EasySpider vs CloakBrowser

EasySpider has 44,558 GitHub stars, 5,386 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser has 31,528 stars, 2,612 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 41% (44,558 vs 31,528 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, CloakBrowser 8%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K CloakBrowser ★ 32K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider CloakBrowser
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 32K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You want the CloakBrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and CloakBrowser fits your workflow better

full CloakBrowser profile →

About EasySpider

EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.

read the full EasySpider overview →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

EasySpider vs Crawl4AI EasySpider vs Scrapling EasySpider vs scrapy EasySpider vs changedetection.io EasySpider vs lux EasySpider vs Scrapegraph-ai EasySpider vs crawlee EasySpider vs colly EasySpider vs stagehand EasySpider vs proxy_pool EasySpider vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API EasySpider vs katana

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or CloakBrowser more popular?

EasySpider has 44,558 GitHub stars and CloakBrowser has 31,528. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and CloakBrowser free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and CloakBrowser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and CloakBrowser?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and CloakBrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or CloakBrowser?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,558 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose CloakBrowser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.