head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs Scrapegraph-ai
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars, 2,719 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Scrapegraph-ai has 32,439 stars, 3,313 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1% (32,693 vs 32,439 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; Scrapegraph-ai is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Scrapegraph-ai 10%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | Scrapegraph-ai | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 32K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 3.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Scrapegraph-ai if
- You want the Scrapegraph-ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Scrapegraph-ai fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About Scrapegraph-ai
🚀 Looking for an even faster and simpler way to scrape at scale (only 5 lines of code)? Check out our enhanced version at ScrapeGraphAI.com ! 🚀 🕷️ ScrapeGraphAI: You Only Scrape Once English 中文 日本語 한국어 Русский Türkçe Deutsch Español français Português Italiano ScrapeGraphAI is a web scraping python library that uses LLM and direct graph logic to create scraping pipelines for websites and local documents (XML, HTML, JSON, Markdown, etc.). Just say which information you want to extract and the library will do it for you! 🚀 Integrations ScrapeGraphAI offers seamless integration with popular frameworks and tools…
read the full Scrapegraph-ai overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or Scrapegraph-ai more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars and Scrapegraph-ai has 32,439. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and Scrapegraph-ai free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and Scrapegraph-ai under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and Scrapegraph-ai?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and Scrapegraph-ai in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or Scrapegraph-ai?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,693 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Scrapegraph-ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.