head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs figranium
CloakBrowser has 31,578 GitHub stars, 2,615 forks, 227 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. figranium has 734 stars, 44 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 4,202% (31,578 vs 734 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; figranium is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, figranium 6%. figranium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, headless-browser, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | figranium | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 734 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick figranium if
- You want the figranium feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and figranium fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About figranium
Figranium is an open source, deterministic browser automation platform that lets teams build visual browser tasks in a block based editor and call them as HTTP APIs — aimed at developers, data engineers, and agent builders who scrape or automate modern web pages without paying usage credits or handing data to a third party host.
read the full figranium overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or figranium more popular?
CloakBrowser has 31,578 GitHub stars and figranium has 734. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and figranium free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and figranium under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and figranium?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and figranium in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or figranium?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,578 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose figranium if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.