head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs figranium
CloakBrowser has 32,721 GitHub stars, 2,721 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. figranium has 782 stars, 49 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 4,084% (32,721 vs 782 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; figranium is written in HTML under GPL-3.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, figranium 6%. figranium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, headless-browser, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | figranium | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 782 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 49 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick figranium if
- You want the figranium feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and figranium fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About figranium
Figranium Figranium is an open source, deterministic browser automation platform that lets you build visual browser tasks that can be called as APIs. Create scraping and automation workflows visually, pass dynamic inputs at runtime, and get structured results—without usage credits or third party data hosting. What You Get Block‑based automation — build flows with actions like click, type, wait, hover, and execute JavaScript against modern pages. Task API — trigger saved tasks via HTTP ( /api/tasks/:id/api ), pass variables at runtime, and secure runs with the API key you control. Captures & Cabinets — review…
read the full figranium overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or figranium more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,721 GitHub stars and figranium has 782. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and figranium free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and figranium under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and figranium?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and figranium in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or figranium?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,721 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose figranium if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.