head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs crw

CloakBrowser has 31,528 GitHub stars, 2,612 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. crw has 1,045 stars, 80 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 2,917% (31,528 vs 1,045 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; crw is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, crw 8%. crw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 32K crw ★ 1.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser crw
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.0K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 80
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick crw if

  • You want the crw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and crw fits your workflow better

full crw profile →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About crw

crw (fastCRW) is a Rust based web scraping, crawling, and search engine with an MCP server that turns URLs into clean markdown or structured JSON, aimed at AI agents and the developers who wire them into coding tools.

read the full crw overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

CloakBrowser vs Crawl4AI CloakBrowser vs Scrapling CloakBrowser vs scrapy CloakBrowser vs EasySpider CloakBrowser vs changedetection.io CloakBrowser vs lux CloakBrowser vs Scrapegraph-ai CloakBrowser vs crawlee CloakBrowser vs colly CloakBrowser vs stagehand CloakBrowser vs proxy_pool CloakBrowser vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or crw more popular?

CloakBrowser has 31,528 GitHub stars and crw has 1,045. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and crw free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and crw under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and crw?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and crw in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or crw?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,528 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose crw if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.