head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs article-extractor
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars, 2,719 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. article-extractor has 1,913 stars, 157 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1,609% (32,693 vs 1,913 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; article-extractor is written in TypeScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, article-extractor 8%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | article-extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-08-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 157 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick article-extractor if
- You want the article-extractor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and article-extractor fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About article-extractor
@extractus/article extractor Extract main article, main image and meta data from URL. Install Deno Node.js / Bun Alternatively, install from npm: Usage APIs extract() extractFromHtml() Transformations Transformation object addTransformations() removeTransformations() Priority order Content sanitization options extract() Load and extract article data from a URL or HTML string. Syntax Example: The result can be null (when no article found) or an ArticleData object: Parameters input required URL string or raw HTML content. parserOptions optional fetcher optional A custom fetch function with the signature (url…
read the full article-extractor overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or article-extractor more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars and article-extractor has 1,913. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and article-extractor free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and article-extractor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and article-extractor?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and article-extractor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or article-extractor?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,693 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose article-extractor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.