head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Litlyx
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Litlyx has 1,748 stars, 116 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 403% (8,789 vs 1,748 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Litlyx is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Litlyx 7%. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | Litlyx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2025-12-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 116 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Litlyx if
- You want the Litlyx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Litlyx fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About Litlyx
📚 Docs 👾 Discord 🌐 Website 🔥 Cloud Litlys is the easiest analytics tool you will ever use. It is fast, modern and completely cookie free. Install in under 30 seconds . Self host with Docker or use our hosted cloud. A powerful alternative to Google Analytics 4, Posthog and Mixpanel. Get Started on our Cloud Version Sign up on Litlyx.com and create a project. Then use your workspace id to connect Litlyx to your website. Universal Installation This minimal setup is all you need to start tracking visitors on your website or web apps with ease. Intergrate with everything You can install Litlyx using npm , pnpm or…
read the full Litlyx overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Litlyx more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and Litlyx has 1,748. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Litlyx free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and Litlyx under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Litlyx?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Litlyx in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Litlyx?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Litlyx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.