head to head · open source

Puter vs Cinny

Puter has 43,565 GitHub stars, 4,066 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped today. Cinny has 3,897 stars, 578 forks, 354 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Puter leads on adoption by 1,018% (43,565 vs 3,897 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Cinny is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Cinny 15%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Cinny ★ 3.9K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Cinny
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 3.9K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 578
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Cinny if

  • You want the Cinny feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Cinny fits your workflow better

full Cinny profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Cinny

Cinny is an open source Matrix client written in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the Matrix ecosystem and is presented as "yet another matrix client," focusing on a simple, elegant, and secure interface. Its stated goal is an instant messaging application that is easy for people and has a modern touch.

read the full Cinny overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs vault puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs nextcloud mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs certificates Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Certipy Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Cinny more popular?

Puter has 43,565 GitHub stars and Cinny has 3,897. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Cinny free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Cinny under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Cinny?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Cinny in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Cinny?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Cinny if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.