head to head · open source
Ladybird vs quasar
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 146% (66,807 vs 27,210 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, quasar 13%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | quasar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 27K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 3.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick quasar if
- You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or quasar more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and quasar free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and quasar?
Ladybird is written in C++ and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or quasar?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.