head to head · open source

checkov vs Harden-Windows-Security

checkov has 9,015 GitHub stars, 1,415 forks, 170 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Harden-Windows-Security has 4,746 stars, 337 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped yesterday. checkov leads on adoption by 90% (9,015 vs 4,746 stars). checkov is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Harden-Windows-Security is written in C# under MIT. checkov has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Harden-Windows-Security 7%. Harden-Windows-Security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (compliance), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

checkov ★ 9.0K Harden-Windows-Security ★ 4.7K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

checkov Harden-Windows-Security
GitHub stars ★ 9.0K ★ 4.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 337
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick checkov if

  • You weight community size — 9.0K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full checkov profile →

pick Harden-Windows-Security if

  • You want the Harden-Windows-Security feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Harden-Windows-Security fits your workflow better

full Harden-Windows-Security profile →

About checkov

Checkov is an open source static code analysis and software composition analysis tool that scans infrastructure as code, container images and open source packages for security and compliance misconfigurations during the build, and it is aimed at developers, DevOps engineers and security teams who want those checks to run before anything is deployed to AWS, Azure or Google Cloud.

read the full checkov overview →

About Harden-Windows-Security

Harden Windows Security is a GitHub repository and Windows focused security project written in C under the MIT license. It provides guides and tools for hardening Windows devices by using official, supported Microsoft methods rather than third party components. The project lives in the Windows and Microsoft security ecosystem, including Defender, BitLocker, firewall configuration, audit, encryption, compliance, enterprise security, and Intune.

read the full Harden-Windows-Security overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

checkov vs lighthouse checkov vs teleport checkov vs lynis checkov vs prowler checkov vs gs-quant checkov vs opa checkov vs Amphion checkov vs kyverno checkov vs aircrack-ng checkov vs tfsec checkov vs rundeck checkov vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is checkov or Harden-Windows-Security more popular?

checkov has 9,015 GitHub stars and Harden-Windows-Security has 4,746. checkov has the larger community by that measure.

Are checkov and Harden-Windows-Security free?

Both are open source. checkov is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Harden-Windows-Security under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between checkov and Harden-Windows-Security?

checkov is written in Python and Harden-Windows-Security in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, checkov or Harden-Windows-Security?

Choose checkov if you want the larger community (9,015 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Harden-Windows-Security if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.