head to head · open source

ccpm vs SparkleShare

ccpm has 8,379 GitHub stars, 836 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. SparkleShare has 4,979 stars, 569 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. ccpm leads on adoption by 68% (8,379 vs 4,979 stars). ccpm is written in Shell under MIT; SparkleShare is written in C# under GPL-3.0. ccpm has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, SparkleShare 11%. SparkleShare was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ccpm ★ 8.4K SparkleShare ★ 5.0K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ccpm SparkleShare
GitHub stars ★ 8.4K ★ 5.0K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Shell C#
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 836 ⑂ 569
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ccpm if

  • You weight community size — 8.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ccpm profile →

pick SparkleShare if

  • You want the SparkleShare feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and SparkleShare fits your workflow better

full SparkleShare profile →

About ccpm

CCPM is a project management skill system for AI coding agents that turns ideas into PRDs, PRDs into epics, epics into GitHub issues, and issues into production code via parallel agents running in Git worktrees, aimed at developers and teams doing agent assisted development on GitHub.

read the full ccpm overview →

About SparkleShare

SparkleShare is a free and open source file sharing and collaboration application written in C and released under the GNU GPLv3 or later, with its Sparkles library under the GNU LGPLv3 or later. It runs on Linux distributions, macOS, and Windows, and it lives in the desktop and self hosted cloud storage ecosystem alongside the Git and Git LFS tooling it depends on. The project has been on GitHub for roughly sixteen years, carries about 4,979 stars and 569 forks, and had its most recent push in September 2026.

read the full SparkleShare overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

ccpm vs vibe-kanban ccpm vs Wekan ccpm vs qinglong ccpm vs edict ccpm vs OpenProject ccpm vs onedev ccpm vs Planka ccpm vs Leantime ccpm vs kanboard ccpm vs Kaneo ccpm vs Fizzy ccpm vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is ccpm or SparkleShare more popular?

ccpm has 8,379 GitHub stars and SparkleShare has 4,979. ccpm has the larger community by that measure.

Are ccpm and SparkleShare free?

Both are open source. ccpm is licensed under MIT and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ccpm and SparkleShare?

ccpm is written in Shell and SparkleShare in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ccpm or SparkleShare?

Choose ccpm if you want the larger community (8,379 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SparkleShare if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.