head to head · open source

camofox-browser vs ketch

camofox-browser has 12,144 GitHub stars, 1,228 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ketch has 740 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. camofox-browser leads on adoption by 1,541% (12,144 vs 740 stars). camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT; ketch is written in Go under MIT. camofox-browser has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ketch 6%. ketch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

camofox-browser ★ 12K ketch ★ 740 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

camofox-browser ketch
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 740
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick camofox-browser if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full camofox-browser profile →

pick ketch if

  • You want the ketch feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ketch fits your workflow better

full ketch profile →

About camofox-browser

camofox browser Anti detection browser server for AI agents, powered by Camoufox Standing on the mighty shoulders of Camoufox a Firefox fork with fingerprint spoofing at the C++ level. Built by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent that runs half on your Mac, half on a dedicated cloud machine just for you with zero maintenance needed. Available on macOS, Telegram, WhatsApp, and email. Try the beta free Pradeep Elankumaran (@pradeep24) — co founder and technical CEO at Jo. Why AI agents need to browse the real web. Playwright gets blocked. Headless Chrome gets fingerprinted. Stealth plugins become the…

read the full camofox-browser overview →

About ketch

ketch A stateless CLI for web search, code search, library docs, and scraping — one binary, no daemon, no API server to run. Why ketch Most research tooling for agents means wiring up several provider SDKs, each with its own auth and response shape. ketch collapses that into one binary with three research surfaces: ketch search — web search, no API key required (Brave, DuckDuckGo, SearXNG, Exa, Firecrawl, Keenable, Tavily, Parallel, SerpBase, Serply, or You.com) ketch code — grep real OSS source across public repos (Grep, Sourcegraph, or GitHub Code Search) ketch docs — curated, version aware library…

read the full ketch overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is camofox-browser or ketch more popular?

camofox-browser has 12,144 GitHub stars and ketch has 740. camofox-browser has the larger community by that measure.

Are camofox-browser and ketch free?

Both are open source. camofox-browser is licensed under MIT and ketch under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between camofox-browser and ketch?

camofox-browser is written in JavaScript and ketch in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, camofox-browser or ketch?

Choose camofox-browser if you want the larger community (12,144 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ketch if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.