head to head · open source

Scrapling vs camofox-browser

Scrapling has 82,464 GitHub stars, 8,405 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. camofox-browser has 11,105 stars, 1,098 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scrapling leads on adoption by 643% (82,464 vs 11,105 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (automation, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 82K camofox-browser ★ 11K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling camofox-browser
GitHub stars ★ 82K ★ 11K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick camofox-browser if

  • You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better

full camofox-browser profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About camofox-browser

camofox browser is an anti detection browser server for AI agents, built in JavaScript and distributed under the MIT license. It wraps Camoufox, a Firefox fork that performs fingerprint spoofing at the C++ implementation level, and exposes that engine through a REST API designed for programmatic agents rather than human users. The project lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is published by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent. It is positioned as a drop in replacement for Puppeteer and Playwright when those tools are blocked.

read the full camofox-browser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Browser Use Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs Lightpanda Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs crawlee Scrapling vs colly Scrapling vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or camofox-browser more popular?

Scrapling has 82,464 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 11,105. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and camofox-browser free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and camofox-browser?

Scrapling is written in Python and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or camofox-browser?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (82,464 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.