head to head · open source
page-agent vs camofox-browser
page-agent has 29,627 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. camofox-browser has 12,144 stars, 1,228 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. page-agent leads on adoption by 144% (29,627 vs 12,144 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. page-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| page-agent | camofox-browser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 1.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick page-agent if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick camofox-browser if
- You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better
About page-agent
Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…
read the full page-agent overview →
About camofox-browser
camofox browser Anti detection browser server for AI agents, powered by Camoufox Standing on the mighty shoulders of Camoufox a Firefox fork with fingerprint spoofing at the C++ level. Built by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent that runs half on your Mac, half on a dedicated cloud machine just for you with zero maintenance needed. Available on macOS, Telegram, WhatsApp, and email. Try the beta free Pradeep Elankumaran (@pradeep24) — co founder and technical CEO at Jo. Why AI agents need to browse the real web. Playwright gets blocked. Headless Chrome gets fingerprinted. Stealth plugins become the…
read the full camofox-browser overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is page-agent or camofox-browser more popular?
page-agent has 29,627 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 12,144. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are page-agent and camofox-browser free?
Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between page-agent and camofox-browser?
page-agent is written in TypeScript and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, page-agent or camofox-browser?
Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,627 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.