head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs camofox-browser
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. camofox-browser has 12,144 stars, 1,228 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 169% (32,712 vs 12,144 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 6 topic tags (antidetect-browser, bot-detection, browser-automation, cloudflare-bypass), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | camofox-browser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 1.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick camofox-browser if
- You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About camofox-browser
camofox browser Anti detection browser server for AI agents, powered by Camoufox Standing on the mighty shoulders of Camoufox a Firefox fork with fingerprint spoofing at the C++ level. Built by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent that runs half on your Mac, half on a dedicated cloud machine just for you with zero maintenance needed. Available on macOS, Telegram, WhatsApp, and email. Try the beta free Pradeep Elankumaran (@pradeep24) — co founder and technical CEO at Jo. Why AI agents need to browse the real web. Playwright gets blocked. Headless Chrome gets fingerprinted. Stealth plugins become the…
read the full camofox-browser overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or camofox-browser more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 12,144. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and camofox-browser free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and camofox-browser?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or camofox-browser?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.