head to head · open source

EasySpider vs camofox-browser

EasySpider has 44,571 GitHub stars, 5,385 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. camofox-browser has 11,105 stars, 1,098 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 301% (44,571 vs 11,105 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. camofox-browser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K camofox-browser ★ 11K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider camofox-browser
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 11K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick camofox-browser if

  • You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better

full camofox-browser profile →

About EasySpider

EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.

read the full EasySpider overview →

About camofox-browser

camofox browser is an anti detection browser server for AI agents, built in JavaScript and distributed under the MIT license. It wraps Camoufox, a Firefox fork that performs fingerprint spoofing at the C++ implementation level, and exposes that engine through a REST API designed for programmatic agents rather than human users. The project lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is published by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent. It is positioned as a drop in replacement for Puppeteer and Playwright when those tools are blocked.

read the full camofox-browser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

EasySpider vs Browser Use EasySpider vs Crawl4AI EasySpider vs Scrapling EasySpider vs scrapy EasySpider vs Lightpanda EasySpider vs changedetection.io EasySpider vs lux EasySpider vs CloakBrowser EasySpider vs Scrapegraph-ai EasySpider vs crawlee EasySpider vs colly EasySpider vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or camofox-browser more popular?

EasySpider has 44,571 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 11,105. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and camofox-browser free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and camofox-browser?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or camofox-browser?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,571 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.