head to head · open source
camofox-browser vs fredy
camofox-browser has 12,144 GitHub stars, 1,228 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. fredy has 1,616 stars, 260 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. camofox-browser leads on adoption by 651% (12,144 vs 1,616 stars). camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT; fredy is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. camofox-browser has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, fredy 16%. fredy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (nodejs, puppeteer), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| camofox-browser | fredy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 260 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick camofox-browser if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fredy if
- You want the fredy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and fredy fits your workflow better
About camofox-browser
camofox browser Anti detection browser server for AI agents, powered by Camoufox Standing on the mighty shoulders of Camoufox a Firefox fork with fingerprint spoofing at the C++ level. Built by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent that runs half on your Mac, half on a dedicated cloud machine just for you with zero maintenance needed. Available on macOS, Telegram, WhatsApp, and email. Try the beta free Pradeep Elankumaran (@pradeep24) — co founder and technical CEO at Jo. Why AI agents need to browse the real web. Playwright gets blocked. Headless Chrome gets fingerprinted. Stealth plugins become the…
read the full camofox-browser overview →
About fredy
Website Demo Quick Start Docs Fredy 🏡 Your Self Hosted Real Estate Finder for Europe Fredy watches 24 real estate portals across 🇩🇪 🇦🇹 🇨🇭 🇪🇸 🇮🇹 🇵🇹 for you (e.g. Immoscout, Kleinanzeigen etc), drops duplicates across platforms, and notifies you via Slack, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Discord and more the moment a new listing appears. Searches are managed from a Web UI, and you never see the same listing twice. On top of the listing itself, Fredy answers the three questions a portal will not: What would this cost me? Enter your income, living costs and savings once, and every listing is measured against…
read the full fredy overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is camofox-browser or fredy more popular?
camofox-browser has 12,144 GitHub stars and fredy has 1,616. camofox-browser has the larger community by that measure.
Are camofox-browser and fredy free?
Both are open source. camofox-browser is licensed under MIT and fredy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between camofox-browser and fredy?
camofox-browser is written in JavaScript and fredy in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, camofox-browser or fredy?
Choose camofox-browser if you want the larger community (12,144 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fredy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.