head to head · open source

camofox-browser vs deepcrawl

camofox-browser has 11,105 GitHub stars, 1,098 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. deepcrawl has 675 stars, 79 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. camofox-browser leads on adoption by 1,545% (11,105 vs 675 stars). camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT; deepcrawl is written in TypeScript under MIT. camofox-browser has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, deepcrawl 12%. camofox-browser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

camofox-browser ★ 11K deepcrawl ★ 675 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

camofox-browser deepcrawl
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 675
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 79
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick camofox-browser if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full camofox-browser profile →

pick deepcrawl if

  • You want the deepcrawl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and deepcrawl fits your workflow better

full deepcrawl profile →

About camofox-browser

camofox browser is an anti detection browser server for AI agents, built in JavaScript and distributed under the MIT license. It wraps Camoufox, a Firefox fork that performs fingerprint spoofing at the C++ implementation level, and exposes that engine through a REST API designed for programmatic agents rather than human users. The project lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is published by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent. It is positioned as a drop in replacement for Puppeteer and Playwright when those tools are blocked.

read the full camofox-browser overview →

About deepcrawl

Deepcrawl is a free, MIT licensed, agent oriented website data extraction platform that turns public pages into cleaned Markdown, a hierarchical links tree and LLM ready metadata, built for developers running AI agents who want to self host the whole stack on Cloudflare or Vercel rather than pay for Firecrawl.

read the full deepcrawl overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

camofox-browser vs Browser Use camofox-browser vs Crawl4AI camofox-browser vs Scrapling camofox-browser vs scrapy camofox-browser vs EasySpider camofox-browser vs Lightpanda camofox-browser vs changedetection.io camofox-browser vs lux camofox-browser vs CloakBrowser camofox-browser vs Scrapegraph-ai camofox-browser vs crawlee camofox-browser vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is camofox-browser or deepcrawl more popular?

camofox-browser has 11,105 GitHub stars and deepcrawl has 675. camofox-browser has the larger community by that measure.

Are camofox-browser and deepcrawl free?

Both are open source. camofox-browser is licensed under MIT and deepcrawl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between camofox-browser and deepcrawl?

camofox-browser is written in JavaScript and deepcrawl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, camofox-browser or deepcrawl?

Choose camofox-browser if you want the larger community (11,105 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose deepcrawl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.