head to head · open source
camofox-browser vs deepcrawl
camofox-browser has 12,144 GitHub stars, 1,228 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. deepcrawl has 696 stars, 82 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. camofox-browser leads on adoption by 1,645% (12,144 vs 696 stars). camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT; deepcrawl is written in TypeScript under MIT. camofox-browser has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, deepcrawl 12%. camofox-browser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| camofox-browser | deepcrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 696 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick camofox-browser if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick deepcrawl if
- You want the deepcrawl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and deepcrawl fits your workflow better
About camofox-browser
camofox browser Anti detection browser server for AI agents, powered by Camoufox Standing on the mighty shoulders of Camoufox a Firefox fork with fingerprint spoofing at the C++ level. Built by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent that runs half on your Mac, half on a dedicated cloud machine just for you with zero maintenance needed. Available on macOS, Telegram, WhatsApp, and email. Try the beta free Pradeep Elankumaran (@pradeep24) — co founder and technical CEO at Jo. Why AI agents need to browse the real web. Playwright gets blocked. Headless Chrome gets fingerprinted. Stealth plugins become the…
read the full camofox-browser overview →
About deepcrawl
Deepcrawl WARNING: DO NOT USE DEEPCRAWL IN PRODUCTION RIGHT NOW AS IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND STILL UNDER RAPID DEVELOPMENT. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! 100% free and open source Firecrawl alternative with better performance and flexibility. Ask DeepWiki about this repo NOTE: DeepCrawl doesn’t target anti scraping or anti bot purposes. It’s optimized for high‑frequency agent workloads that scrape public pages to extract cleaned Markdown and a hierarchical links tree. Deepcrawl is an agent oriented website data context extraction platform. It extracts cleaned markdown of page content, agent favoured hierarchical links…
read the full deepcrawl overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is camofox-browser or deepcrawl more popular?
camofox-browser has 12,144 GitHub stars and deepcrawl has 696. camofox-browser has the larger community by that measure.
Are camofox-browser and deepcrawl free?
Both are open source. camofox-browser is licensed under MIT and deepcrawl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between camofox-browser and deepcrawl?
camofox-browser is written in JavaScript and deepcrawl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, camofox-browser or deepcrawl?
Choose camofox-browser if you want the larger community (12,144 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose deepcrawl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.