head to head · open source

bentopdf vs papermerge-core

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars, 1,339 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. papermerge-core has 539 stars, 110 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. bentopdf leads on adoption by 2,790% (15,578 vs 539 stars). bentopdf is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; papermerge-core is written in Python under Apache-2.0. bentopdf has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, papermerge-core 20%. bentopdf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (pdf), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bentopdf ★ 16K papermerge-core ★ 539 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

bentopdf papermerge-core
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 539
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 110
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bentopdf if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bentopdf profile →

pick papermerge-core if

  • You want the papermerge-core feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and papermerge-core fits your workflow better

full papermerge-core profile →

About bentopdf

BentoPDF is a JavaScript, browser based PDF toolkit that merges, edits, converts, and processes documents entirely on the client, and it is aimed at individuals and teams who need those document workflows without sending files to a third party service.

read the full bentopdf overview →

About papermerge-core

Papermerge DMS (papermerge core) is the open source core of Papermerge, a document management system in Python that OCRs scanned documents, indexes them, and makes them searchable for anyone who needs a long term digital archive rather than a folder full of loose files.

read the full papermerge-core overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

bentopdf vs Docuseal bentopdf vs Documenso bentopdf vs Papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu bentopdf vs OpenSign bentopdf vs Papra bentopdf vs mm-wiki bentopdf vs organize bentopdf vs community bentopdf vs docspell bentopdf vs PaperKnife bentopdf vs pdfx

Frequently asked questions

Is bentopdf or papermerge-core more popular?

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars and papermerge-core has 539. bentopdf has the larger community by that measure.

Are bentopdf and papermerge-core free?

Both are open source. bentopdf is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and papermerge-core under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bentopdf and papermerge-core?

bentopdf is written in JavaScript and papermerge-core in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bentopdf or papermerge-core?

Choose bentopdf if you want the larger community (15,578 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose papermerge-core if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.