head to head · open source

bentopdf vs organize

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars, 1,339 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. organize has 3,147 stars, 189 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. bentopdf leads on adoption by 395% (15,578 vs 3,147 stars). bentopdf is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; organize is written in Python under MIT. bentopdf has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, organize 6%. bentopdf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bentopdf ★ 16K organize ★ 3.1K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

bentopdf organize
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 3.1K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 189
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bentopdf if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bentopdf profile →

pick organize if

  • You want the organize feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and organize fits your workflow better

full organize profile →

About bentopdf

BentoPDF is a JavaScript, browser based PDF toolkit that merges, edits, converts, and processes documents entirely on the client, and it is aimed at individuals and teams who need those document workflows without sending files to a third party service.

read the full bentopdf overview →

About organize

organize is a Python command line tool for automating file management tasks. It is released under the MIT license, has 3145 stars and 189 forks, and is positioned as an open source alternative to desktop file automation apps such as Hazel on macOS and File Juggler on Windows. The project lives in the Python ecosystem and is distributed through pip as the organize tool package.

read the full organize overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

bentopdf vs Docuseal bentopdf vs Documenso bentopdf vs Papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu bentopdf vs OpenSign bentopdf vs Papra bentopdf vs mm-wiki bentopdf vs community bentopdf vs docspell bentopdf vs PaperKnife bentopdf vs pdfx bentopdf vs signaturepdf

Frequently asked questions

Is bentopdf or organize more popular?

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars and organize has 3,147. bentopdf has the larger community by that measure.

Are bentopdf and organize free?

Both are open source. bentopdf is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and organize under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bentopdf and organize?

bentopdf is written in JavaScript and organize in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bentopdf or organize?

Choose bentopdf if you want the larger community (15,578 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose organize if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.