head to head · open source

bentopdf vs Papra

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars, 1,339 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Papra has 5,466 stars, 301 forks, 190 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bentopdf leads on adoption by 185% (15,578 vs 5,466 stars). bentopdf is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Papra is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. bentopdf has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Papra 6%. Papra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bentopdf ★ 16K Papra ★ 5.5K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

bentopdf Papra
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 5.5K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 301
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bentopdf if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bentopdf profile →

pick Papra if

  • You want the Papra feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Papra fits your workflow better

full Papra profile →

About bentopdf

BentoPDF is a JavaScript, browser based PDF toolkit that merges, edits, converts, and processes documents entirely on the client, and it is aimed at individuals and teams who need those document workflows without sending files to a third party service.

read the full bentopdf overview →

About Papra

Papra is a minimalistic, self hostable, open source document management and archiving platform, written in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 licence, for anyone who needs to store documents for the long term and find them again later.

read the full Papra overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

bentopdf vs Docuseal bentopdf vs Documenso bentopdf vs Papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu bentopdf vs OpenSign bentopdf vs mm-wiki bentopdf vs organize bentopdf vs community bentopdf vs docspell bentopdf vs PaperKnife bentopdf vs pdfx bentopdf vs signaturepdf

Frequently asked questions

Is bentopdf or Papra more popular?

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars and Papra has 5,466. bentopdf has the larger community by that measure.

Are bentopdf and Papra free?

Both are open source. bentopdf is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Papra under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bentopdf and Papra?

bentopdf is written in JavaScript and Papra in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bentopdf or Papra?

Choose bentopdf if you want the larger community (15,578 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Papra if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.