head to head · open source

Beekeeper Studio vs workout-cool

Beekeeper Studio has 23,841 GitHub stars, 1,665 forks, 1,168 open issues and last shipped yesterday. workout-cool has 8,662 stars, 765 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Beekeeper Studio leads on adoption by 175% (23,841 vs 8,662 stars). Beekeeper Studio is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; workout-cool is written in TypeScript under MIT. Beekeeper Studio has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, workout-cool 9%. Beekeeper Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Beekeeper Studio ★ 24K workout-cool ★ 8.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Beekeeper Studio workout-cool
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 8.7K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 765
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Beekeeper Studio if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Beekeeper Studio profile →

pick workout-cool if

  • You want the workout-cool feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and workout-cool fits your workflow better

full workout-cool profile →

About Beekeeper Studio

🌐 EN PT BR ES DE FR EL JA IT KO ID SW Beekeeper Studio Beekeeper Studio is a cross platform SQL editor and database manager available for Linux, Mac, and Windows. Download Beekeeper Studio We publish binaries for MacOS, Windows, and Linux. Beekeeper Studio is free to download and provides a lot of features for free, no sign up, registration, or credit card required. The app provides some premium features for a reasonable cost license fee. Learn more here Most of the code in this repo is open source under the GPLv3 license. Paid features are also in this repository under a commercial source available license. We…

read the full Beekeeper Studio overview →

About workout-cool

Workout.cool Modern fitness coaching platform with comprehensive exercise database Deutsch Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Table of Contents About Project Origin & Motivation Quick Start Exercise Database Import Project Architecture Contributing Self hosting Resources License Sponsor This Project Contributors Sponsors They are helping making workout.cool free and open source for everyone : lj020326 lucasnevespereira About A comprehensive fitness coaching platform that allows create workout plans for you, track progress, and access a vast exercise database with detailed instructions and video…

read the full workout-cool overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Beekeeper Studio or workout-cool more popular?

Beekeeper Studio has 23,841 GitHub stars and workout-cool has 8,662. Beekeeper Studio has the larger community by that measure.

Are Beekeeper Studio and workout-cool free?

Both are open source. Beekeeper Studio has no licence declared in this registry, and workout-cool is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Beekeeper Studio and workout-cool?

Beekeeper Studio is written in TypeScript and workout-cool in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Beekeeper Studio or workout-cool?

Choose Beekeeper Studio if you want the larger community (23,841 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose workout-cool if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.