head to head · open source
Archon vs sdk-go
Archon has 23,823 GitHub stars, 3,520 forks, 321 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. sdk-go has 996 stars, 370 forks, 229 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Archon leads on adoption by 2,292% (23,823 vs 996 stars). Archon is written in TypeScript under MIT; sdk-go is written in Go under MIT. Archon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, sdk-go 37%. sdk-go was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Archon | sdk-go | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 996 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.5K | ⑂ 370 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Archon if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sdk-go if
- You want the sdk-go feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and sdk-go fits your workflow better
About Archon
Archon The first open source harness builder for AI coding. Make AI coding deterministic and repeatable. Archon is a workflow engine for AI coding agents. Define your development processes as YAML workflows planning, implementation, validation, code review, PR creation and run them reliably across all your projects. Like what Dockerfiles did for infrastructure and GitHub Actions did for CI/CD Archon does for AI coding workflows. Think n8n, but for software development. Why Archon? When you ask an AI agent to "fix this bug", what happens depends on the model's mood. It might skip planning. It might forget to run…
read the full Archon overview →
About sdk-go
Temporal Go SDK Temporal is a distributed, scalable, durable, and highly available orchestration engine used to execute asynchronous long running business logic in a scalable and resilient way. "Temporal Go SDK" is Temporal's framework for authoring workflows and activities using the Go language. Add the SDK to your project The core Temporal Go SDK packages, including client , worker , and workflow , are released together as the go.temporal.io/sdk module. From your application's Go module, run: Then import the packages you need, such as: The integrations and tools under contrib are released as separate Go…
read the full sdk-go overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Archon or sdk-go more popular?
Archon has 23,823 GitHub stars and sdk-go has 996. Archon has the larger community by that measure.
Are Archon and sdk-go free?
Both are open source. Archon is licensed under MIT and sdk-go under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Archon and sdk-go?
Archon is written in TypeScript and sdk-go in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Archon or sdk-go?
Choose Archon if you want the larger community (23,823 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sdk-go if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.