head to head · open source

Archon vs one

Archon has 23,505 GitHub stars, 3,474 forks, 321 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. one has 1,745 stars, 533 forks, 771 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Archon leads on adoption by 1,247% (23,505 vs 1,745 stars). Archon is written in TypeScript under MIT; one is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Archon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, one 31%. Archon was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Archon ★ 24K one ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Archon one
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 1.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.5K ⑂ 533
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Archon if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Archon profile →

pick one if

  • You want the one feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and one fits your workflow better

full one profile →

About Archon

Archon is an open source workflow engine for AI coding agents, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. It lives in the AI coding ecosystem, alongside tools such as Claude Code, and is distributed through the Bun runtime and the GitHub CLI. The project describes itself as a harness builder: it lets a developer encode a development process as a YAML workflow and then run that workflow reliably across projects. Workflows are stored in a .archon/workflows/ directory and committed to the repository, so the same definition can be invoked from the CLI, a web UI, Slack, Telegram, or GitHub.…

read the full Archon overview →

About one

OpenNebula is an open source cloud management platform, licensed under Apache 2.0, for building and operating private clouds, edge infrastructures, distributed cloud deployments, and AI Factories.

read the full one overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Archon vs ansible Archon vs compose Archon vs conductor Archon vs xxl-job Archon vs gitleaks Archon vs Kestra Archon vs haystack Archon vs rancher Archon vs Prefect Archon vs Temporal Archon vs rowboat Archon vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is Archon or one more popular?

Archon has 23,505 GitHub stars and one has 1,745. Archon has the larger community by that measure.

Are Archon and one free?

Both are open source. Archon is licensed under MIT and one under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Archon and one?

Archon is written in TypeScript and one in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Archon or one?

Choose Archon if you want the larger community (23,505 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose one if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.