head to head · open source

archify vs WWDC

archify has 81,305 GitHub stars, 5,489 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. archify leads on adoption by 830% (81,305 vs 8,742 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 81K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 8.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in JavaScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs rea archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs herdr archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or WWDC more popular?

archify has 81,305 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and WWDC free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and WWDC?

archify is written in JavaScript and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or WWDC?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (81,305 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.