head to head · open source

archify vs Acode

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars, 4,517 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. Acode has 7,050 stars, 1,571 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. archify leads on adoption by 859% (67,632 vs 7,050 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; Acode is written in JavaScript under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Acode 22%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 68K Acode ★ 7.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify Acode
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 7.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 4.5K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick Acode if

  • You want the Acode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Acode fits your workflow better

full Acode profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About Acode

Acode is a free, MIT licensed code editor for Android, distributed by the Acode Foundation under the package name com.foxdebug.acodefree on Google Play and com.foxdebug.acode on F Droid, and it is aimed at developers who want to read, edit, and preview source files directly on an Android phone or tablet.

read the full Acode overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools archify vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or Acode more popular?

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars and Acode has 7,050. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and Acode free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and Acode under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and Acode?

archify is written in JavaScript and Acode in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or Acode?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (67,632 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Acode if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.