head to head · open source

AppSmith vs lapce

AppSmith has 40,904 GitHub stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lapce has 38,860 stars, 1,333 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped today. AppSmith leads on adoption by 5% (40,904 vs 38,860 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, lapce 3%. lapce was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K lapce ★ 39K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith lapce
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 39K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick lapce if

  • You want the lapce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lapce fits your workflow better

full lapce profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs ECC AppSmith vs react AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs puppeteer AppSmith vs archify AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs i-have-adhd AppSmith vs codebase-memory-mcp AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs it-tools AppSmith vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or lapce more popular?

AppSmith has 40,904 GitHub stars and lapce has 38,860. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and lapce free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lapce under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AppSmith and lapce?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and lapce in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or lapce?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,904 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lapce if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.