head to head · open source

Apache SkyWalking vs m3

Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars, 6,633 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. m3 has 4,898 stars, 463 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 410% (24,958 vs 4,898 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; m3 is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, m3 9%. m3 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (metrics, prometheus), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache SkyWalking ★ 25K m3 ★ 4.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache SkyWalking m3
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 4.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 463
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache SkyWalking if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache SkyWalking profile →

pick m3 if

  • You want the m3 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and m3 fits your workflow better

full m3 profile →

About Apache SkyWalking

Apache SkyWalking is an open source application performance monitoring (APM) system for distributed systems in cloud native architectures, built for teams that run microservices across Kubernetes and container based environments.

read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →

About m3

M3 is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based monorepo that provides a distributed time series database, query engine, metrics aggregator, and Prometheus sidecar for teams that need to store and query large volumes of metrics on their own infrastructure.

read the full m3 overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Apache SkyWalking vs Uptime Kuma Apache SkyWalking vs worldmonitor Apache SkyWalking vs NetData Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Apache SkyWalking vs huginn Apache SkyWalking vs Sentry Apache SkyWalking vs SigNoz Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Loki Apache SkyWalking vs beszel Apache SkyWalking vs cilium Apache SkyWalking vs jaeger Apache SkyWalking vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or m3 more popular?

Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars and m3 has 4,898. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache SkyWalking and m3 free?

Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and m3 under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and m3?

Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and m3 in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or m3?

Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,958 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose m3 if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.