head to head · open source
Apache SkyWalking vs hertzbeat
Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars, 6,633 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. hertzbeat has 7,398 stars, 1,330 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 237% (24,958 vs 7,398 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; hertzbeat is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, hertzbeat 18%. hertzbeat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Apache SkyWalking | hertzbeat | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 7.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.6K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Apache SkyWalking if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick hertzbeat if
- You want the hertzbeat feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and hertzbeat fits your workflow better
About Apache SkyWalking
Apache SkyWalking is an open source application performance monitoring (APM) system for distributed systems in cloud native architectures, built for teams that run microservices across Kubernetes and container based environments.
read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →
About hertzbeat
Apache HertzBeat is an AI powered, next generation open source real time observability system written in Java under the Apache 2.0 licence, built for teams that need unified metrics and logs collection, centralized alerting distribution, and intelligent management and analysis without deploying an agent on every monitored host.
read the full hertzbeat overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache SkyWalking or hertzbeat more popular?
Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars and hertzbeat has 7,398. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.
Are Apache SkyWalking and hertzbeat free?
Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hertzbeat under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and hertzbeat?
Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and hertzbeat in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or hertzbeat?
Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,958 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hertzbeat if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.