head to head · open source

Apache SkyWalking vs gf

Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars, 6,633 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. gf has 13,277 stars, 1,719 forks, 148 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 88% (24,958 vs 13,277 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; gf is written in Go under MIT. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, gf 13%. gf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache SkyWalking ★ 25K gf ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache SkyWalking gf
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache SkyWalking if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache SkyWalking profile →

pick gf if

  • You want the gf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gf fits your workflow better

full gf profile →

About Apache SkyWalking

Apache SkyWalking is an open source application performance monitoring (APM) system for distributed systems in cloud native architectures, built for teams that run microservices across Kubernetes and container based environments.

read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →

About gf

GoFrame is an MIT licensed, production ready application framework for the Go programming language that provides a full stack toolkit — HTTP server, ORM, logging, tracing, and command line scaffolding — in a single dependency, aimed at Go teams that want one coherent framework instead of assembling many separate libraries.

read the full gf overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Apache SkyWalking vs Uptime Kuma Apache SkyWalking vs worldmonitor Apache SkyWalking vs NetData Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Apache SkyWalking vs huginn Apache SkyWalking vs Sentry Apache SkyWalking vs SigNoz Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Loki Apache SkyWalking vs beszel Apache SkyWalking vs cilium Apache SkyWalking vs jaeger Apache SkyWalking vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or gf more popular?

Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars and gf has 13,277. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache SkyWalking and gf free?

Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gf under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and gf?

Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and gf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or gf?

Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,958 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gf if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.