head to head · open source
Apache SkyWalking vs fsmon
Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars, 6,633 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. fsmon has 1,028 stars, 162 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 2,328% (24,958 vs 1,028 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; fsmon is written in C under MIT. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, fsmon 16%. Apache SkyWalking was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Apache SkyWalking | fsmon | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | C |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-04-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.6K | ⑂ 162 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Apache SkyWalking if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fsmon if
- You want the fsmon feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and fsmon fits your workflow better
About Apache SkyWalking
Apache SkyWalking is an open source application performance monitoring (APM) system for distributed systems in cloud native architectures, built for teams that run microservices across Kubernetes and container based environments.
read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →
About fsmon
fsmon is a low level, cross platform filesystem monitor that reports kernel level file events on Linux, Android, iOS and macOS as colourful terminal output or JSON, built for system administrators, incident responders, security researchers, forensic analysts, developers debugging I/O heavy applications, and reverse engineers.
read the full fsmon overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache SkyWalking or fsmon more popular?
Apache SkyWalking has 24,958 GitHub stars and fsmon has 1,028. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.
Are Apache SkyWalking and fsmon free?
Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fsmon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and fsmon?
Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and fsmon in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or fsmon?
Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,958 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fsmon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.