head to head · open source

Apache SkyWalking vs Cachet

Apache SkyWalking has 24,954 GitHub stars, 6,634 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cachet has 15,244 stars, 1,633 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 64% (24,954 vs 15,244 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Cachet is written in PHP under a custom or non-standard licence. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, Cachet 11%. Cachet was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache SkyWalking ★ 25K Cachet ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache SkyWalking Cachet
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache SkyWalking if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache SkyWalking profile →

pick Cachet if

  • You want the Cachet feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Cachet fits your workflow better

full Cachet profile →

About Apache SkyWalking

Apache SkyWalking is an open source application performance monitoring (APM) system for distributed systems in cloud native architectures, built for teams that run microservices across Kubernetes and container based environments.

read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →

About Cachet

Cachet is an open source, self hosted status page system. It lives in the PHP and Laravel ecosystem, and it is categorized under Infrastructure and Operations and Monitoring and Observability. The project is intended for teams that need a dedicated place to communicate service status and downtime in a transparent way.

read the full Cachet overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Apache SkyWalking vs Uptime Kuma Apache SkyWalking vs worldmonitor Apache SkyWalking vs NetData Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Apache SkyWalking vs huginn Apache SkyWalking vs Sentry Apache SkyWalking vs SigNoz Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Loki Apache SkyWalking vs beszel Apache SkyWalking vs cilium Apache SkyWalking vs jaeger Apache SkyWalking vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or Cachet more popular?

Apache SkyWalking has 24,954 GitHub stars and Cachet has 15,244. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache SkyWalking and Cachet free?

Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Cachet has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and Cachet?

Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and Cachet in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or Cachet?

Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,954 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Cachet if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.