head to head · open source

Apache SkyWalking vs booklogr

Apache SkyWalking has 24,988 GitHub stars, 6,632 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. booklogr has 637 stars, 37 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 3,823% (24,988 vs 637 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; booklogr is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, booklogr 6%. Apache SkyWalking was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache SkyWalking ★ 25K booklogr ★ 637 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache SkyWalking booklogr
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 637
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-10-12
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 37
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache SkyWalking if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache SkyWalking profile →

pick booklogr if

  • You want the booklogr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and booklogr fits your workflow better

full booklogr profile →

About Apache SkyWalking

Apache SkyWalking ========== SkyWalking : an APM (Application Performance Monitoring) system, especially designed for microservices, cloud native and container based architectures. Abstract SkyWalking is an open source APM system that provides monitoring, tracing and diagnosing capabilities for distributed systems in Cloud Native architectures. Distributed Tracing End to end distributed tracing. Service topology analysis, service centric observability and APIs dashboards. Agents for your stack Java, .Net Core, PHP, NodeJS, Golang, LUA, Rust, C++, Client JavaScript and Python agents with active development and…

read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →

About booklogr

BookLogr A simple, self hosted service to keep track of your personal library. 🗒️Explore the docs » 💻View Demo 🐞Report Bug ✨Request Feature 👷Service status ❤️Sponsor this project 👉About the project BookLogr is a web app designed to help you manage your personal book library with ease. This self hosted service ensures that you have complete control over your data, providing a secure and private way to keep track of all the books you own, read, or wish to read. Optionally you can also display your library proudly to the public, sharing it with your friends and family. [!IMPORTANT] This project is under active…

read the full booklogr overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or booklogr more popular?

Apache SkyWalking has 24,988 GitHub stars and booklogr has 637. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache SkyWalking and booklogr free?

Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and booklogr under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and booklogr?

Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and booklogr in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or booklogr?

Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,988 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose booklogr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.