head to head · open source

ansible vs tugtainer

ansible has 70,721 GitHub stars, 24,333 forks, 837 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tugtainer has 1,533 stars, 52 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. ansible leads on adoption by 4,513% (70,721 vs 1,533 stars). ansible is written in Python under GPL-3.0; tugtainer is written in Python under MIT. ansible has attracted 34% as many forks as stars, tugtainer 3%. ansible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ansible ★ 71K tugtainer ★ 1.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ansible tugtainer
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 24K ⑂ 52
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ansible if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ansible profile →

pick tugtainer if

  • You want the tugtainer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and tugtainer fits your workflow better

full tugtainer profile →

About ansible

Ansible is a radically simple, agentless IT automation platform, written in Python and licensed under GPL 3.0, that handles configuration management, application deployment, cloud provisioning, ad hoc task execution, network automation, and multi node orchestration for operators, developers, and network and cloud teams who manage machines over plain SSH.

read the full ansible overview →

About tugtainer

Tugtainer is a self hosted Python application with a web UI that automates updates of Docker containers, built for homelab operators and small infrastructure teams who want per container control over what gets updated instead of blanket auto updating everything on a host.

read the full tugtainer overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs Kestra ansible vs haystack ansible vs rancher ansible vs Prefect ansible vs Archon ansible vs Temporal ansible vs rowboat ansible vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is ansible or tugtainer more popular?

ansible has 70,721 GitHub stars and tugtainer has 1,533. ansible has the larger community by that measure.

Are ansible and tugtainer free?

Both are open source. ansible is licensed under GPL-3.0 and tugtainer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ansible and tugtainer?

ansible is written in Python and tugtainer in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ansible or tugtainer?

Choose ansible if you want the larger community (70,721 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tugtainer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.