head to head · open source

ansible vs livecontext-ce

ansible has 70,740 GitHub stars, 24,333 forks, 837 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. livecontext-ce has 502 stars, 59 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. ansible leads on adoption by 13,992% (70,740 vs 502 stars). ansible is written in Python under GPL-3.0; livecontext-ce is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. ansible has attracted 34% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 12%. ansible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ansible ★ 71K livecontext-ce ★ 502 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ansible livecontext-ce
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 502
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 24K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ansible if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ansible profile →

pick livecontext-ce if

  • You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better

full livecontext-ce profile →

About ansible

Ansible is a radically simple, agentless IT automation platform, written in Python and licensed under GPL 3.0, that handles configuration management, application deployment, cloud provisioning, ad hoc task execution, network automation, and multi node orchestration for operators, developers, and network and cloud teams who manage machines over plain SSH.

read the full ansible overview →

About livecontext-ce

LiveContext CE is the self hosted, AGPL 3.0 Community Edition of the LiveContext AI automation platform, a single Docker deployed service where a team describes a job in chat and gets back a readable workflow, scoped AI agents and a small app the team actually uses.

read the full livecontext-ce overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs Kestra ansible vs haystack ansible vs rancher ansible vs Prefect ansible vs Archon ansible vs Temporal ansible vs rowboat ansible vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is ansible or livecontext-ce more popular?

ansible has 70,740 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 502. ansible has the larger community by that measure.

Are ansible and livecontext-ce free?

Both are open source. ansible is licensed under GPL-3.0 and livecontext-ce under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ansible and livecontext-ce?

ansible is written in Python and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ansible or livecontext-ce?

Choose ansible if you want the larger community (70,740 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.