head to head · open source
ansible vs livecontext-ce
ansible has 71,235 GitHub stars, 24,444 forks, 837 open issues and last shipped today. livecontext-ce has 776 stars, 73 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. ansible leads on adoption by 9,080% (71,235 vs 776 stars). ansible is written in Python under GPL-3.0; livecontext-ce is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. ansible has attracted 34% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 9%. ansible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ansible | livecontext-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 71K | ★ 776 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 24K | ⑂ 73 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ansible if
- You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick livecontext-ce if
- You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better
About ansible
[ ][copying] Ansible Ansible is a radically simple IT automation system. It handles configuration management, application deployment, cloud provisioning, ad hoc task execution, network automation, and multi node orchestration. Ansible makes complex changes like zero downtime rolling updates with load balancers easy. More information on the Ansible website. Design Principles Have an extremely simple setup process with a minimal learning curve. Manage machines quickly and in parallel. Avoid custom agents and additional open ports, be agentless by leveraging the existing SSH daemon. Describe infrastructure in a…
read the full ansible overview →
About livecontext-ce
LiveContext The AI automation platform. One message in, a working automation out. Describe the job in chat and LiveContext builds it in front of you: a workflow you can read, AI agents with scoped access and budgets you control, and a small app your team actually uses. Chat, Workflow, Agent and App in one self hosted platform. No code to write, nothing to stitch together. An open source, self hosted alternative to n8n, Zapier and Make, with AI agents built in. The builder, built by chat: one message in, a working automation out. Five real scenarios, one loop. Watch it full size · Try the hosted version ⭐…
read the full livecontext-ce overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ansible or livecontext-ce more popular?
ansible has 71,235 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 776. ansible has the larger community by that measure.
Are ansible and livecontext-ce free?
Both are open source. ansible is licensed under GPL-3.0, and livecontext-ce has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ansible and livecontext-ce?
ansible is written in Python and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ansible or livecontext-ce?
Choose ansible if you want the larger community (71,235 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.