head to head · open source

AnotherRedisDesktopManager vs sh

AnotherRedisDesktopManager has 34,834 GitHub stars, 2,714 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. sh has 3,518 stars, 1,056 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. AnotherRedisDesktopManager leads on adoption by 890% (34,834 vs 3,518 stars). AnotherRedisDesktopManager is written in JavaScript under MIT; sh is written in Shell under Apache-2.0. AnotherRedisDesktopManager has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, sh 30%. sh was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (redis), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AnotherRedisDesktopManager ★ 35K sh ★ 3.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AnotherRedisDesktopManager sh
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 3.5K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Shell
Last push 2026-08-20 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AnotherRedisDesktopManager if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AnotherRedisDesktopManager profile →

pick sh if

  • You want the sh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and sh fits your workflow better

full sh profile →

About AnotherRedisDesktopManager

Another Redis Desktop Manager 🚀🚀🚀 A faster, better and more stable redis desktop manager, compatible with Linux, windows, mac. What's more, it won't crash when loading massive keys. 简体中文 Windows Download latest exe package from release \or [gitee in China\], double click to install. Or by chocolatey : choco install another redis desktop manager Or by winget : winget install qishibo.AnotherRedisDesktopManager Or sponsor by win store, It's not free, and I will be very grateful to you. Linux Download latest AppImage package from release \or [gitee in China\], chmod +x , double click to run. Or by snap : sudo…

read the full AnotherRedisDesktopManager overview →

About sh

KEJILION.SH · 科技lion一键脚本工具 面向 Linux 服务器的综合脚本工具箱,集成系统管理、网络测试、Docker、LDNMP 建站、 应用市场、备份迁移与安全防护。 介绍 · 一键安装 · 支持系统 · 效果图预览 · 核心功能 · KPanel · 开源许可 介绍 科技Lion 的 Shell 脚本工具是一款全能脚本工具箱,专为 Linux 监控、测试和管理而设计。 无论您是初学者还是经验丰富的用户,该工具都能提供便捷的解决方案。脚本集成 Docker 管理、LDNMP 建站、网站优化与防御、备份还原迁移,以及各类系统工具和应用的安装管理, 让服务器维护更加简单。 KejiLion's Shell script is an all in one toolbox designed for Linux monitoring, testing, and server management. It brings together Docker management, LDNMP website deployment, optimization, protection, backup, restoration, migration, and common server applications in one interactive tool. 一键安装 使用 root 用户执行以下命令。 中文版 bash…

read the full sh overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is AnotherRedisDesktopManager or sh more popular?

AnotherRedisDesktopManager has 34,834 GitHub stars and sh has 3,518. AnotherRedisDesktopManager has the larger community by that measure.

Are AnotherRedisDesktopManager and sh free?

Both are open source. AnotherRedisDesktopManager is licensed under MIT and sh under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AnotherRedisDesktopManager and sh?

AnotherRedisDesktopManager is written in JavaScript and sh in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AnotherRedisDesktopManager or sh?

Choose AnotherRedisDesktopManager if you want the larger community (34,834 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sh if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.