head to head · open source

aircrack-ng vs UTMStack

aircrack-ng has 7,659 GitHub stars, 1,375 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. UTMStack has 582 stars, 76 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 1,216% (7,659 vs 582 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; UTMStack is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, UTMStack 13%. UTMStack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

aircrack-ng ★ 7.7K UTMStack ★ 582 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

aircrack-ng UTMStack
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 582
License GPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 76
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick aircrack-ng if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full aircrack-ng profile →

pick UTMStack if

  • You want the UTMStack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and UTMStack fits your workflow better

full UTMStack profile →

About aircrack-ng

Aircrack ng is a GPL 2.0 licensed suite of WiFi security auditing tools written in C, intended for network auditors, penetration testers, and compliance and risk management teams who assess wireless networks on hardware they control.

read the full aircrack-ng overview →

About UTMStack

UTMStack is an open source, AGPL 3.0 unified threat management platform that merges SIEM and XDR into one system, built for security operations centre teams, incident responders and compliance owners who need real time log correlation, threat detection and audit evidence without handing their telemetry to a closed vendor.

read the full UTMStack overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

aircrack-ng vs lighthouse aircrack-ng vs teleport aircrack-ng vs lynis aircrack-ng vs prowler aircrack-ng vs gs-quant aircrack-ng vs opa aircrack-ng vs Amphion aircrack-ng vs checkov aircrack-ng vs kyverno aircrack-ng vs tfsec aircrack-ng vs rundeck aircrack-ng vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is aircrack-ng or UTMStack more popular?

aircrack-ng has 7,659 GitHub stars and UTMStack has 582. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.

Are aircrack-ng and UTMStack free?

Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and UTMStack under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between aircrack-ng and UTMStack?

aircrack-ng is written in C and UTMStack in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or UTMStack?

Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,659 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose UTMStack if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.