head to head · open source
aircrack-ng vs flashlight
aircrack-ng has 7,860 GitHub stars, 1,404 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. flashlight has 1,612 stars, 51 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 388% (7,860 vs 1,612 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; flashlight is written in TypeScript under MIT. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, flashlight 3%. flashlight was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aircrack-ng | flashlight | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | C | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 51 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aircrack-ng if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flashlight if
- You want the flashlight feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and flashlight fits your workflow better
About aircrack-ng
Aircrack ng Badges GitHub CI Others Repository versions Description Aircrack ng is a complete suite of tools to assess WiFi network security. It focuses on different areas of WiFi security: Monitoring: Packet capture and export of data to text files for further processing by third party tools. Attacking: Replay attacks, deauthentication, fake access points and others via packet injection. Testing: Checking WiFi cards and driver capabilities (capture and injection). Cracking: WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). All tools are command line which allows for heavy scripting. A lot of GUIs have taken advantage of this…
read the full aircrack-ng overview →
About flashlight
Get a performance score for your app 🔦 Flashlight generates a performance score for your Android app, aggregating different metrics. (📱 iOS support is also in the works) 🙅 No setup required in your app 🚀 Measure performance even on production apps ✨ Generates beautiful reports (like this Flatlist/Flashlist comparison) With Flashlight 🔦, you can either: Upload an app and get your performance score on app.flashlight.dev Or use the CLI: flashlight measure : quickly audit your perf with real time measures flashlight test : automate your measures with e2e performance testing over several iterations flashlight…
read the full flashlight overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aircrack-ng or flashlight more popular?
aircrack-ng has 7,860 GitHub stars and flashlight has 1,612. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.
Are aircrack-ng and flashlight free?
Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and flashlight under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aircrack-ng and flashlight?
aircrack-ng is written in C and flashlight in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or flashlight?
Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,860 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose flashlight if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.