head to head · open source

agent-framework vs agent-orchestrator

agent-framework has 14,499 GitHub stars, 2,558 forks, 617 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agent-orchestrator has 14,021 stars, 1,911 forks, 711 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agent-framework leads on adoption by 3% (14,499 vs 14,021 stars). agent-framework is written in Python under MIT; agent-orchestrator is written in Go under Apache-2.0. agent-framework has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, agent-orchestrator 14%. agent-orchestrator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

agent-framework ★ 14K agent-orchestrator ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

agent-framework agent-orchestrator
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick agent-framework if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full agent-framework profile →

pick agent-orchestrator if

  • You want the agent-orchestrator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and agent-orchestrator fits your workflow better

full agent-orchestrator profile →

About agent-framework

Welcome to Microsoft Agent Framework! Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) is an open, multi language framework for building production grade AI agents and multi agent workflows in .NET and Python . Microsoft Agent Framework is built for teams taking agents from prototype to production. It provides a consistent foundation for building, orchestrating, and operating agent systems across Python, .NET and Go, while keeping architecture choices open as requirements evolve, and supports a broad ecosystem including Microsoft Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, and the GitHub Copilot SDK, with samples and hosting patterns for…

read the full agent-framework overview →

About agent-orchestrator

Agent Orchestrator Plan, run, and supervise coding agents from one place. Give every coding task its own agent, workspace, and feedback loop. Plan and delegate larger outcomes with a project aware orchestrator. Follow every worker, pull request, CI run, and review in a live Kanban. Download AO • Documentation • Releases • Contributing • Discord English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Português (Brasil) A workspace for agent driven development One coding agent can handle a task. Running several across a project creates a different job: deciding what matters, splitting work…

read the full agent-orchestrator overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is agent-framework or agent-orchestrator more popular?

agent-framework has 14,499 GitHub stars and agent-orchestrator has 14,021. agent-framework has the larger community by that measure.

Are agent-framework and agent-orchestrator free?

Both are open source. agent-framework is licensed under MIT and agent-orchestrator under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between agent-framework and agent-orchestrator?

agent-framework is written in Python and agent-orchestrator in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, agent-framework or agent-orchestrator?

Choose agent-framework if you want the larger community (14,499 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agent-orchestrator if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.