head to head · open source
afrog vs cwe_checker
afrog has 4,420 GitHub stars, 483 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. cwe_checker has 1,360 stars, 143 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. afrog leads on adoption by 225% (4,420 vs 1,360 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; cwe_checker is written in Rust under LGPL-3.0. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, cwe_checker 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (vulnerability-scanner), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| afrog | cwe_checker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.4K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | HTML | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 483 | ⑂ 143 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick afrog if
- You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cwe_checker if
- You want the cwe_checker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and cwe_checker fits your workflow better
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
About cwe_checker
cwe checker is a suite of static analysis checks that scans ELF binaries for common bug classes — formally known as Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs), such as null pointer dereferences and buffer overflows — and it is aimed at security analysts, reverse engineers, and firmware analysts who need to find potentially vulnerable code paths in compiled executables.
read the full cwe_checker overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is afrog or cwe_checker more popular?
afrog has 4,420 GitHub stars and cwe_checker has 1,360. afrog has the larger community by that measure.
Are afrog and cwe_checker free?
Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and cwe_checker under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between afrog and cwe_checker?
afrog is written in HTML and cwe_checker in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, afrog or cwe_checker?
Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,420 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cwe_checker if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.