head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs sequential-workflow-designer
ActivePieces has 25,364 GitHub stars, 4,428 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483 stars, 151 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 1,610% (25,364 vs 1,483 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; sequential-workflow-designer is written in TypeScript under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, sequential-workflow-designer 10%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | sequential-workflow-designer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 151 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sequential-workflow-designer if
- You want the sequential-workflow-designer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and sequential-workflow-designer fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About sequential-workflow-designer
Sequential Workflow Designer A sequential workflow designer with no external dependencies for web applications. It is written in pure TypeScript and uses SVG for rendering. This designer is not associated with any workflow engine; it is fully generic. You can use it to create any kind of application, from graphical programming languages to workflow builders. Features: No external dependencies Fully generic and configurable Supports light, dark, and soft themes, with easy customization Compatible with modern browsers and mobile devices Definitions are stored as JSON Supports Angular, React and Svelte. 📝 Check…
read the full sequential-workflow-designer overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or sequential-workflow-designer more popular?
ActivePieces has 25,364 GitHub stars and sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and sequential-workflow-designer free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and sequential-workflow-designer is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and sequential-workflow-designer?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and sequential-workflow-designer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or sequential-workflow-designer?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,364 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose sequential-workflow-designer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.