head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs Automatisch
ActivePieces has 25,343 GitHub stars, 4,422 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Automatisch has 14,007 stars, 1,061 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 81% (25,343 vs 14,007 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Automatisch is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Automatisch 8%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (workflow), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | Automatisch | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 14K |
| License | Custom / other | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Automatisch if
- You want the Automatisch feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Automatisch fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About Automatisch
Automatisch Open Source Zapier Alternative 🧐 Automatisch is a business automation tool that lets you connect different services like Twitter, Slack, and more to automate your business processes. 💸 Automating your workflows doesn't have to be a difficult or expensive process. You also don't need any programming knowledge to use Automatisch. Advantages There are other existing solutions in the market, like Zapier and Integromat, so you might be wondering why you should use Automatisch. ✅ One of the main benefits of using Automatisch is that it allows you to store your data on your own servers, which is essential…
read the full Automatisch overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or Automatisch more popular?
ActivePieces has 25,343 GitHub stars and Automatisch has 14,007. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and Automatisch free?
Neither ActivePieces nor Automatisch declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and Automatisch?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and Automatisch in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or Automatisch?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,343 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Automatisch if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.