head to head · open source

ActivePieces vs loopx

ActivePieces has 24,522 GitHub stars, 4,201 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. loopx has 5,890 stars, 554 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 316% (24,522 vs 5,890 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, loopx 9%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, workflow-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ActivePieces ★ 25K loopx ★ 5.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ActivePieces loopx
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 5.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 554
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ActivePieces if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ActivePieces profile →

pick loopx if

  • You want the loopx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and loopx fits your workflow better

full loopx profile →

About ActivePieces

ActivePieces is an open source, TypeScript based no code automation platform for building AI workflows and exposing integrations as MCP servers, aimed at both technical and non technical users who want Zapier style automation while keeping control of their own data.

read the full ActivePieces overview →

About loopx

LoopX is an open, provider neutral, local first control plane for long horizon AI agents that preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns for developers and teams running durable, governed work on harnesses such as Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.

read the full loopx overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs activepieces n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

ActivePieces vs n8n ActivePieces vs Browser Use ActivePieces vs frigate ActivePieces vs Lightpanda ActivePieces vs ProxmoxVE ActivePieces vs Skyvern ActivePieces vs Automa ActivePieces vs LiveKit ActivePieces vs amis ActivePieces vs Windmill ActivePieces vs Botpress ActivePieces vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is ActivePieces or loopx more popular?

ActivePieces has 24,522 GitHub stars and loopx has 5,890. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.

Are ActivePieces and loopx free?

Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and loopx is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ActivePieces and loopx?

ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and loopx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ActivePieces or loopx?

Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (24,522 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose loopx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.