head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs lazyskills
ActivePieces has 25,126 GitHub stars, 4,366 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lazyskills has 581 stars, 78 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 4,225% (25,126 vs 581 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; lazyskills is written in Go under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, lazyskills 13%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | lazyskills | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 581 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-09-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 78 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazyskills if
- You want the lazyskills feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and lazyskills fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About lazyskills
Lazy Skills Blazing fast mission control for agent skills. "I don't debug broken skills by hand I have a TUI to be disappointed for me." 🌴 Overview LazySkills is a blazing fast terminal UI for managing agent skills. It gives you one place to see what is installed, which agents can use each skill, why visibility may be broken, and what actions are safe to run next. ✨ Features See every skill in one place project, global, universal, and agent specific skills in a single TUI. Check agent visibility switch agents and see which skills are actually usable by Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and many…
read the full lazyskills overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or lazyskills more popular?
ActivePieces has 25,126 GitHub stars and lazyskills has 581. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and lazyskills free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and lazyskills is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and lazyskills?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and lazyskills in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or lazyskills?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,126 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose lazyskills if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.