head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs flowgram.ai
ActivePieces has 24,522 GitHub stars, 4,201 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flowgram.ai has 8,454 stars, 769 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 190% (24,522 vs 8,454 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | flowgram.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 8.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 769 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flowgram.ai if
- You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
ActivePieces is an open source, TypeScript based no code automation platform for building AI workflows and exposing integrations as MCP servers, aimed at both technical and non technical users who want Zapier style automation while keeping control of their own data.
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About flowgram.ai
FlowGram is an MIT licensed TypeScript framework and toolkit that gives developers a free or fixed layout canvas, a node configuration form engine, a variable scope chain, and ready to use materials such as LLM, Condition, and Code Editor nodes so they can build their own AI workflow platforms faster and simpler.
read the full flowgram.ai overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or flowgram.ai more popular?
ActivePieces has 24,522 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,454. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and flowgram.ai free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and flowgram.ai is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and flowgram.ai?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or flowgram.ai?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (24,522 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.