head to head · open source

Acode vs web-maker

Acode has 7,050 GitHub stars, 1,571 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. web-maker has 2,699 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Acode leads on adoption by 161% (7,050 vs 2,699 stars). Acode is written in JavaScript under MIT; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. Acode has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. Acode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Acode ★ 7.0K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Acode web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 7.0K ★ 2.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Acode if

  • You weight community size — 7.0K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Acode profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About Acode

Acode is a free, MIT licensed code editor for Android, distributed by the Acode Foundation under the package name com.foxdebug.acodefree on Google Play and com.foxdebug.acode on F Droid, and it is aimed at developers who want to read, edit, and preview source files directly on an Android phone or tablet.

read the full Acode overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Acode vs ECC Acode vs react Acode vs Langflow Acode vs Supabase Acode vs puppeteer Acode vs archify Acode vs PocketBase Acode vs i-have-adhd Acode vs codebase-memory-mcp Acode vs ToolJet Acode vs AppSmith Acode vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Acode or web-maker more popular?

Acode has 7,050 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,699. Acode has the larger community by that measure.

Are Acode and web-maker free?

Both are open source. Acode is licensed under MIT and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Acode and web-maker?

Acode is written in JavaScript and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Acode or web-maker?

Choose Acode if you want the larger community (7,050 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.