head to head · open source

Langflow vs Acode

Langflow has 155,023 GitHub stars, 10,119 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped today. Acode has 7,050 stars, 1,571 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Langflow leads on adoption by 2,099% (155,023 vs 7,050 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; Acode is written in JavaScript under MIT. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Acode 22%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K Acode ★ 7.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow Acode
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 7.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick Acode if

  • You want the Acode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Acode fits your workflow better

full Acode profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About Acode

Acode is a free, MIT licensed code editor for Android, distributed by the Acode Foundation under the package name com.foxdebug.acodefree on Google Play and com.foxdebug.acode on F Droid, and it is aimed at developers who want to read, edit, and preview source files directly on an Android phone or tablet.

read the full Acode overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs supabase react vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools Langflow vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or Acode more popular?

Langflow has 155,023 GitHub stars and Acode has 7,050. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and Acode free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and Acode under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and Acode?

Langflow is written in Python and Acode in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or Acode?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,023 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Acode if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.