head to head · open source

ACI.dev vs Convertigo

ACI.dev has 4,891 GitHub stars, 485 forks, 63 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Convertigo has 385 stars, 71 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ACI.dev leads on adoption by 1,170% (4,891 vs 385 stars). ACI.dev is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Convertigo is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. ACI.dev has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Convertigo 18%. Convertigo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ACI.dev ★ 4.9K Convertigo ★ 385 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ACI.dev Convertigo
GitHub stars ★ 4.9K ★ 385
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-05-28 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 485 ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ACI.dev if

  • You weight community size — 4.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ACI.dev profile →

pick Convertigo if

  • You want the Convertigo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Convertigo fits your workflow better

full Convertigo profile →

About ACI.dev

ACI.dev is an open source tool calling platform that connects more than 600 tools to any agentic IDE or custom AI agent. It lives in the Python ecosystem and is released under the Apache 2.0 license, with the backend, developer portal, and integrations all published as open source. Agents reach tools either through direct function calling or through a Unified Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, and the same capabilities are also exposed through a lightweight Python SDK and a TypeScript SDK that work with any LLM framework.

read the full ACI.dev overview →

About Convertigo

Convertigo is an open source, AI driven low code and no code platform for building and running full stack enterprise web, mobile, and PWA business applications, aimed at professional developers who program back end microservice workflows and at non technical citizen developers who assemble form based apps.

read the full Convertigo overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo nango vs aci-dev nango vs convertigo opencode vs nango opencode vs jitsu opencode vs orbital nango vs jitsu opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Integration Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Integration Platforms field.

ACI.dev vs Nango ACI.dev vs Jitsu ACI.dev vs Orbital

Frequently asked questions

Is ACI.dev or Convertigo more popular?

ACI.dev has 4,891 GitHub stars and Convertigo has 385. ACI.dev has the larger community by that measure.

Are ACI.dev and Convertigo free?

Both are open source. ACI.dev is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Convertigo has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ACI.dev and Convertigo?

ACI.dev is written in Python and Convertigo in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ACI.dev or Convertigo?

Choose ACI.dev if you want the larger community (4,891 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Convertigo if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.