head to head · open source

Zen Browser vs Flow

Zen Browser has 44,481 GitHub stars, 1,754 forks, 689 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Flow has 1,075 stars, 61 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Zen Browser leads on adoption by 4,038% (44,481 vs 1,075 stars). Zen Browser is written in C++ under MPL-2.0; Flow is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Zen Browser has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Flow 6%. Zen Browser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zen Browser ★ 44K Flow ★ 1.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zen Browser Flow
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 1.1K
License MPL-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-30
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 61
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zen Browser if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zen Browser profile →

pick Flow if

  • You want the Flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Flow fits your workflow better

full Flow profile →

About Zen Browser

Zen Browser is a privacy focused, open source web browser built on Firefox’s Gecko engine. It inherits Firefox’s compatibility and extension ecosystem while introducing a streamlined interface and productivity oriented features. The project lives in the desktop browser ecosystem, targeting users who want a Firefox based experience with reduced clutter and enhanced customization.

read the full Zen Browser overview →

About Flow

Flow Browser is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed desktop web browser built on Electron and Chromium, written in TypeScript, that runs Chrome extensions from the Chrome Web Store and is aimed at people who want a minimal, privacy focused alternative to mainstream browsers.

read the full Flow overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Zen Browser vs uBlock Zen Browser vs Ladybird Zen Browser vs chrome-devtools-mcp Zen Browser vs monaco-editor Zen Browser vs servo Zen Browser vs serenity Zen Browser vs refined-github Zen Browser vs slate Zen Browser vs Avalonia Zen Browser vs webtorrent Zen Browser vs fingerprintjs Zen Browser vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Zen Browser or Flow more popular?

Zen Browser has 44,481 GitHub stars and Flow has 1,075. Zen Browser has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zen Browser and Flow free?

Both are open source. Zen Browser is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Flow under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zen Browser and Flow?

Zen Browser is written in C++ and Flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zen Browser or Flow?

Choose Zen Browser if you want the larger community (44,481 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Flow if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.